Portia’s Island

The world is slowly getting fucked up becuase of Global Warming and still all that people can think about is how to make money. It makes me sooooo fucking angry!!!!!!!

I just watched “An Inconvenient Truth”, and I think its one of the best documentaries I’ve seen. I went to my room straight way to blog it, to encourage everybody to watch it, because it will really open up your mind to the reality of global warming. And what the fuck! I saw this article on Yahoo! entitled “Riches await as earth’s icy north melts” http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070324/ap_on_sc/arctic_bonanza

What the fuck?! I do not usually use swear words and I never like using swear words, but is that article for real? The world is slowly getting fucked and I can’t believe plenty of people are actually looking forward to it because they can make big bucks out of the whole situation! Nations are actually ready to send warships to guard a bit of rock in the middle of nowhere because when the arctic ice melts, then ships can pass from Europe to the Pacific side of Canada and the US and that means profit for some corporation somewhere. And then there is the oil in the Arctic Sea that everybody is speculating is there. Yes, the all important oil that will fuel the economy, the oil that will end up being burned and contribute to the climate crisis we are facing now.

I AM REALLY PISSED OFF. Don’t these people know that if the polar ice caps melt, then the whole world will get fucked? Millions of people will die from starvation, flooding, intense typhoons, and from too much heat or too much cold–and that’s just the tip of the iceberg. Global warming is happening, and that is a fact. And we are not heedng it, our politicians are not doing something about it. And most of us do not even care! Oh, and the icing on top of the cake: Some people are actually looking forward for the ice caps to melt so that they can get rich!

Its enough to make anybody who even has the slightest concern about what will happen to the world rant our in anger. Have we become so materialistic that we do not even see the state of the world we live in beyond the money that we will make? Are people actually that callous to look forward to an impending disaster because of the money windfall it will give them?

I believe that the icecaps will actually melt in 15 years time—that everything the scientists have warned us as the consequences because of the high levels of greenhouse gas emissions in the atmosphere will come true in my lifetime. Unless the politicians in the US and in every other nation in the world implement measures to curb it. Unless ordinary people everywhere,including the third world nations, change their ways and strive for to reduce their individual carbon consumption.

But what hope is there when the biggest nation in the world is controlled by a moron who’s terrorizing his own country and killing off people on the other side of the world? And when the whole world seems to be run by all these giant corporations that are only concerned about the profit they will make?

This is all too much for me to take in right now… Too much negative energy….I need to put on my jogging shoes and run.

RICHES AWAIT AS EARTH’S ICY NORTH MELTS

HAMMERFEST, Norway - Barren and uninhabited, Hans Island is very hard to find on a map. Yet these days the Frisbee-shaped rock in the Arctic is much in demand — so much so that Canada and Denmark have both staked their claim to it with flags and warships. ADVERTISEMENT

The reason: an international race for oil, fish, diamonds and shipping routes, accelerated by the impact of global warming on Earth’s frozen north.

The latest report by the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says the ice cap is warming faster than the rest of the planet and ice is receding, partly due to greenhouse gases. It’s a catastrophic scenario for the Arctic ecosystem, for polar bears and other wildlife, and for Inuit populations whose ancient cultures depend on frozen waters.

But some see a lucrative silver lining of riches waiting to be snatched from the deep, and the prospect of timesaving sea lanes that could transform the shipping industry the way the Suez Canal did in the 19th century.

The
U.S. Geological Survey estimates the Arctic has as much as 25 percent of the world’s undiscovered oil and gas. Russia reportedly sees the potential of minerals in its slice of the Arctic sector approaching $2 trillion.

All this has pushed governments and businesses into a scramble for sovereignty over these suddenly priceless seas.

Regardless of climate change, oil and gas exploration in the Arctic is moving full speed ahead. State-controlled Norwegian oil company Statoil ASA plans to start tapping gas from its offshore Snoehvit field in December, the first in the Barents Sea. It uses advanced equipment on the ocean floor, remote-controlled from the Norwegian oil boom town of Hammerfest through a 90-mile undersea cable.

Alan Murray, an analyst with the consulting firm Wood Mackenzie, said most petroleum companies are now focusing research and exploration on the far north. Russia is developing the vast Shkotman natural gas field off its Arctic coast, and Norwegians hope their advanced technology will find a place there.

“Oil will bring a big geopolitical focus. It is a driving force in the Arctic,” said Arvid Jensen, a consultant in Hammerfest who advises companies that hope to hitch their economic wagons to the northern rush.

It could open the North Pole region to easy navigation for five months a year, according to the latest Arctic Climate Impact Assessment, an intergovernmental group. That could cut sailing time from Germany to Alaska by 60 percent, going through Russia’s Arctic instead of the Panama Canal.

Or the Northwest Passage could open through the channels of Canada’s Arctic islands and shorten the voyage from Europe to the Far East. And that’s where Hans Island, at the entrance to the Northwest Passage, starts to matter.

The half-square-mile rock, just one-seventh the size of New York’s Central Park, is wedged between Canada’s Ellesmere Island and Danish-ruled Greenland, and for more than 20 years has been a subject of unusually bitter exchanges between the two
NATO allies.

In 1984, Denmark’s minister for Greenland affairs, Tom Hoeyem, caused a stir when he flew in on a chartered helicopter, raised a Danish flag on the island, buried a bottle of brandy at the base of the flagpole and left a note saying: “Welcome to the Danish island.”

The dispute erupted again two years ago when Canadian Defense Minister Bill Graham set foot on the rock while Canadian troops hoisted the Maple Leaf flag.

Denmark sent a letter of protest to Ottawa, while Canadians and Danes took out competing Google ads, each proclaiming sovereignty over the rock 680 miles south of the North Pole.

Some Canadians even called for a boycott of Danish pastries.

Although both countries have repeatedly sent warships to the island to make their presence felt, there’s no risk of a shooting war — both sides are resolved to settle the problem peacefully. But the prospect of a warmer planet opening up the icy waters has helped push the issue up the agenda.

“We all realize that because of global warming it will suddenly be an area that will become more accessible,” said Peter Taksoe-Jensen, head of the Danish Foreign Ministry’s legal department.

Shortcuts through Arctic waters are no longer the stuff of science fiction.

In August 2005, the Akademik Fyodorov of Russia was the first ship to reach the North Pole without icebreaker help. The Norwegian shipyard Aker Yards is building innovative vessels that sail forward in clear waters, and then turn around to plow with their sterns through heavier ice.

Global warming is also bringing an unexpected bonus to American transportation company OmniTrax Inc., which a decade ago bought the small underutilized Northwest Passage port of Churchill, Manitoba, for a token fee of 10 Canadian dollars (about $8).

The company, which is private, won’t say how much money it is making in Churchill, but it was estimated to have moved more than 500,000 tons of grain through the port in 2007.

Managing director Michael Ogborn said climate change was not something the company thought about in 1997.

“But over the last 10 years we saw a lengthening of the season, which appears to be related to global warming,” Ogborn said. “We see the trend continuing.”

Just a few years ago, reports said it would take 100 years for the ice to melt, but recent studies say it could happen in 10-15 years, and the United States, Canada, Russia, Denmark and Norway have been rushing to stake their claims in the Arctic.

Norway and Russia have issues in the Barents Sea; the U.S. and Russia in Beaufort Sea; the U.S. and Canada over rights to the Northwest Passage; and even Alaska and Canada’s Yukon province over their offshore boundary.

Canada, Russia and Denmark are seeking to claim waters all the way up to the North Pole, saying the seabed is part of their continental shelf under the 1982
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Norway wants to extend its claims on the same basis, although not all the way to the pole.

Canada says the Northwest Passage is its territory, a claim the United States hotly disputes, insisting the waters are neutral. Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper has pledged to put military icebreakers in the frigid waters “to assert our sovereignty and take action to protect our territorial integrity.”

Politics aside, there are environmental concerns. Apart from the risk of oil spills, more vessels could carry alien organisms into the Northwest Passage, posing a risk to indigenous life forms.

The Arctic melt has also been intensifying competition over dwindling fishing stocks.

Fish stocks essential to some regions appear to be moving to colder waters, and thus into another country’s fishing grounds. Russian and Norwegian fishermen already report catching salmon much farther north than is normal.

“It is potentially very dramatic for fish stocks. They could move toward the North Pole, which would make sovereignty very unclear,” said Dag Vongraven, an environmental expert at the Norwegian Polar Institute.

Russia contests Norway’s claims to fish-rich waters around the Arctic Svalbard Islands, and has even sent warships there to underscore its discontent with the Norwegian Coast Guard boarding Russian trawlers there.

“Even though they say it is about fish, it is really about oil,” said Jensen, the consultant in Hammerfest.

In 2004, Russian President
Vladimir Putin called the sovereignty issue “a serious, competitive battle” that “will unfold more and more fiercely.”

With all the squabbling over ownership, Tristan Pearce, a research associate at the University of Guelph’s Global Environmental Change Group in Canada, reminded Arctic nations of who got there first: indigenous peoples like the Inuits and the Sami.

“Everybody is talking about the potential for minerals, diamonds, oil and gas, but we mustn’t forget that people live there, all the way across the Arctic,” he said. “They’ve always been there and they have a major role to play.”

___

Associated Press reporters Beth Duff-Brown in Toronto, Phil Couvrette in Montreal, Mike Eckel in Moscow, Dan Joling in Anchorage, Alaska, and Karl Ritter in Stockholm, Sweden, contributed to this report.

This entry was posted on Monday, March 26th, 2007 at 12:44 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.